headset: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.60
, phone
Weight: 0.58
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.58
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(headset, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(headset, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(phone, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(phone, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(headset, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(headset, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(headset, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(headset, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(headset, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)