health insurance: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
has quality cost 0.81
has quality service 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(insurance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(retirement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(retirement, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(retirement, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(retirement, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(coverage, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(insurance, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(insurance, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coverage, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(retirement, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(retirement, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(coverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(insurance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(retirement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(retirement, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(health insurance, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(health insurance, has quality right)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(health insurance, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coverage, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(retirement, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(insurance, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(retirement, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(retirement, has quality worth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(retirement, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coverage, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(insurance, has quality good)