hearing: be expensive in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.60
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.34
, memorial day
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32
, gathering
Weight: 0.32
, discussion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in uk 1.00
is expensive uk 1.00
is uk 0.94
be expensive in canada 0.89
be expensive in usa 0.89
be expensive in australia 0.88
be expensive in zealand 0.84
be expensive in new zealand 0.83
is expensive 0.78
be in singapore 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(meeting, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(forum, is uk)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(forum, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hearing, is expensive uk)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hearing, is expensive uk)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hearing, is uk)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hearing, is uk)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hearing, is expensive uk)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hearing, is uk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in usa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in australia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in usa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in australia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in usa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hearing, is expensive uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(hearing, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hearing, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in usa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hearing, is uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hearing, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(forum, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)