heart failure: qualify for security

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents failure
Weight: 0.77
, heart disease
Weight: 0.76
, atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.74
, complication
Weight: 0.71
Siblings congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.87
, heart attack
Weight: 0.79
, heart
Weight: 0.67
, cardiomyopathy
Weight: 0.56
, renal failure
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
qualify for security 1.00
qualify for social security 0.96
qualify for disability 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for security)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for disability)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(congestive heart failure, qualify for security)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for social security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(congestive heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(congestive heart failure, qualify for disability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(congestive heart failure, qualify for disability)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(heart failure, qualify for security)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(heart failure, qualify for disability)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(heart failure, qualify for disability)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for disability)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(heart failure, qualify for disability)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(heart failure, qualify for security)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(congestive heart failure, qualify for security)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(congestive heart failure, qualify for social security)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, qualify for security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(congestive heart failure, qualify for disability)