heat pump: run time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.80
, heating
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat sink
Weight: 0.39
, heat stroke
Weight: 0.39
, temperature
Weight: 0.37
, furnace
Weight: 0.37
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
run time 1.00
keep running 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(furnace, run time)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(furnace, keep running)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(furnace, run time)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(furnace, run time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(furnace, keep running)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(furnace, keep running)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(heat pump, run time)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(heat pump, keep running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(heat pump, keep running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heat pump, keep running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(heat pump, run time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(furnace, run time)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(furnace, keep running)