heater: be in car working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, heating element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radiator
Weight: 0.56
, heating
Weight: 0.35
, furnace
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34
, toaster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in car working 1.00
work on cars 0.87
be in car smell 0.80
work on electric cars 0.79
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(heater, be in car working)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(option, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(option, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(radiator, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(toaster, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(heating, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(heater, be in car working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(heating, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(heating, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(toaster, work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(toaster, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(radiator, work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(radiator, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(heater, be in car working)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(heater, work on cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(heater, work on cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(heater, work on cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(heater, work on electric cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(heater, be in car smell)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(heater, work on electric cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(heater, work on electric cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(heater, be in car smell)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car smell)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(heater, work on cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(heater, be in car smell)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, work on electric cars)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(heater, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(heater, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(heater, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heater, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(heater, be in car working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(heating, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(toaster, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radiator, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(heater, be in car working)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)