heater: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, heating element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radiator
Weight: 0.56
, heating
Weight: 0.35
, furnace
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34
, toaster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
be 100 efficient 1.00
be efficient 1.00
be efficient 100 percent 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furnace, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(heater, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(heater, be efficient)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)