heating element: quit working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.69
, part
Weight: 0.68
, layer
Weight: 0.64
, feature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat
Weight: 0.65
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.63
, radiator
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.57
, induction
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
quit working 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(heater, quit working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(heater, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(heater, quit working)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(heating element, quit working)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heating element, quit working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heating element, quit working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(heating element, quit working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(heater, quit working)