heating: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ventilation system
Weight: 0.66
, need
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings furnace
Weight: 0.57
, heater
Weight: 0.35
, plumbing
Weight: 0.33
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.33
, insulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality better 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
is quality 0.84
affect change 0.83
cause color change 0.80
cause colour change 0.79
has quality cost 0.79
cause changes in matter 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heating, has quality change)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heating, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(insulation, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(air conditioning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(insulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insulation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heater, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(heater, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(heating, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heating, cause color change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heating, cause colour change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(heating, cause color change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(heating, cause colour change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(heating, cause colour change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(heating, cause color change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(heating, cause colour change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(heating, cause color change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(heating, cause changes in matter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(heating, cause changes in matter)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(heating, cause changes in matter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heating, cause changes in matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(heating, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(insulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(insulation, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(heating, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)