heel: have red bottoms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shoe
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, exercise
Weight: 0.54
, body part
Weight: 0.54
, pressure point
Weight: 0.52
Siblings toe
Weight: 0.33
, knee
Weight: 0.33
, knee pad
Weight: 0.33
, forearm
Weight: 0.33
, leg
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red bottoms 1.00
has physical part bottoms 0.90
turn red 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toe, turn red)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leg, turn red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(leg, turn red)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(leg, turn red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(toe, turn red)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(toe, turn red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(heel, have red bottoms)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(heel, turn red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(heel, turn red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(heel, turn red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(heel, turn red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(heel, have red bottoms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(toe, turn red)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(heel, have red bottoms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leg, turn red)