helicopter: be with intermeshing rotors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings black hawk
Weight: 0.60
, chinook
Weight: 0.50
, apaches
Weight: 0.39
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.36
, paraglider
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with intermeshing rotors 1.00
be with intermeshing rotors rare 0.98
be with rotors 0.96
have two rotors 0.95
need two rotors 0.95
be with rotors rare 0.93
have tail rotors 0.93
need tail rotors 0.92
have two rotor blades 0.88
have tail rotor physics 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinook, have two rotors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(helicopter, need two rotors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinook, have two rotors)