helicopter: need tail rotor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings black hawk
Weight: 0.60
, chinook
Weight: 0.50
, apaches
Weight: 0.39
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.36
, paraglider
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need tail rotor 1.00
have tail rotor 0.99
have tail rotor physics 0.96
have two rotor blades 0.93
need tail rotors 0.92
have tail rotors 0.91
measure rotor torque 0.90
need two rotors 0.86
be with rotors 0.85
have two rotors 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinook, have two rotors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(helicopter, have tail rotor)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(helicopter, have tail rotor)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(helicopter, have tail rotor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, have tail rotor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(helicopter, need two rotors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinook, have two rotors)