helicopter: need two rotors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings black hawk
Weight: 0.60
, chinook
Weight: 0.50
, apaches
Weight: 0.39
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.36
, paraglider
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need two rotors 1.00
have two rotors 0.99
be with rotors 0.98
need tail rotors 0.95
be with rotors rare 0.95
be with intermeshing rotors 0.95
have tail rotors 0.95
be with intermeshing rotors rare 0.93
have two rotor blades 0.89
need tail rotor 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(chinook, have two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinook, have two rotors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(helicopter, need two rotors)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(helicopter, be with intermeshing rotors rare)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need tail rotor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(helicopter, need tail rotor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(helicopter, need tail rotor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(helicopter, need tail rotor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(helicopter, need two rotors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, need two rotors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinook, have two rotors)