helping: has trait fun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.37
, day
Weight: 0.29
, problem
Weight: 0.28
, help
Weight: 0.28
, everyone
Weight: 0.21
Siblings charity
Weight: 0.26
, homeless shelter
Weight: 0.26
, task force
Weight: 0.26
, family member
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait fun 1.00
be considered trait 0.87
be considered trait of professionals 0.78
trait of professionals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(helping, has trait fun)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(helping, be considered trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(helping, trait of professionals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(helping, trait of professionals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(helping, trait of professionals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(helping, be considered trait of professionals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(helping, trait of professionals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(helping, has trait fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(helping, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(helping, has trait fun)