henry: was bad king

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents son
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, football player
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
Siblings henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, jesse james
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad king 1.00
was good king 0.98
is good king 0.96
was king 0.95
was important king 0.94
was 2 good king 0.93
was best king 0.93
was great king 0.93
was considered king 0.91
was 2 king 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(henry, was bad king)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(henry, was king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(henry, was considered king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(henry, was king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(henry, was king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(henry, was considered king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(henry, was 2 good king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(henry, was 2 good king)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(henry, was good king)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(henry, was 2 good king)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(henry, was 2 good king)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(henry, was considered king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(henry, was great king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(henry, was great king)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(henry, was important king)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(henry, was good king)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(henry, was great king)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(henry, was great king)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(henry, was good king)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(henry, was good king)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(henry, was important king)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(henry, was important king)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(henry, was important king)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(henry, was king)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(henry, was considered king)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(henry, was bad king)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(henry, was bad king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(henry, was bad king)