henry: was good king

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents son
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, football player
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
Siblings henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, jesse james
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good king 1.00
is good king 0.98
was bad king 0.98
was great king 0.97
was king 0.96
was important king 0.96
was best king 0.95
was 2 good king 0.95
was considered king 0.93
was 2 king 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(henry, was good king)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(henry, was king)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(henry, was king)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(henry, was king)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(henry, was 2 good king)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(henry, was considered king)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(henry, was bad king)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(henry, was 2 good king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(henry, was considered king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(henry, was considered king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(henry, was great king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(henry, was bad king)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(henry, was bad king)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(henry, was 2 good king)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(henry, was bad king)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(henry, was great king)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(henry, was 2 good king)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(henry, was great king)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(henry, was great king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(henry, was important king)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(henry, was important king)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(henry, was important king)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(henry, was important king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(henry, was king)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(henry, was considered king)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(henry, was good king)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(henry, was good king) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(henry, was good king)