henry: was grady important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents son
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, football player
Weight: 0.56
, man
Weight: 0.56
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was grady important 1.00
is flagler important 0.93
be important moseley 0.91
was successful 0.78
is cavendish important 0.77
was tudor important man 0.76
was famous 0.76
was famous wadsworth longfellow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was successful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(michael jackson, was famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(henry, was grady important)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(henry, was successful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(henry, was famous wadsworth longfellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(henry, was tudor important man)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(henry, was famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(henry, was famous wadsworth longfellow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(henry, was successful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(henry, was successful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(henry, was famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(henry, was successful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(henry, was tudor important man)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(henry, was tudor important man)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(henry, was tudor important man)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(henry, was famous wadsworth longfellow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(henry, was famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(henry, was famous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(henry, was famous wadsworth longfellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(henry, was grady important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(henry, was grady important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(henry, was grady important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was famous)