hermes: be birkin expensive bag

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be birkin expensive bag 1.00
have expensive bags 0.92
have costly bags 0.88
was associated with bag of money 0.87
was associated with bag 0.87
has physical part bags 0.82
have investment bags 0.80
be birkin expensive 0.77
is expensive 0.76
is iwatch expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(volvo, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(burberry, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chanel, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(subaru, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have investment bags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hermes, have investment bags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hermes, have investment bags)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hermes, have investment bags)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hermes, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hermes, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hermes, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hermes, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volvo, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chanel, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subaru, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)