hermes: be on top of station

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on top of station 1.00
be on top of central station 0.94
be on top of grand station 0.91
be on top of grand central station 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(hermes, be on top of station)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hermes, be on top of central station)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hermes, be on top of grand station)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hermes, be on top of grand station)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hermes, be on top of central station)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hermes, be on top of grand station)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be on top of grand central station)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be on top of grand station)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hermes, be on top of central station)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hermes, be on top of grand central station)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be on top of central station)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hermes, be on top of grand central station)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hermes, be on top of grand central station)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be on top of station)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hermes, be on top of station)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hermes, be on top of station)