hermes: have costly bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have costly bags 1.00
have expensive bags 0.94
be birkin expensive bag 0.88
has physical part bags 0.83
be birkin expensive 0.81
is expensive 0.79
is iwatch expensive 0.79
have investment bags 0.79
was associated with bag of money 0.78
was associated with bag 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(volvo, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(burberry, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chanel, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(subaru, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have investment bags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hermes, have investment bags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hermes, have investment bags)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hermes, have investment bags)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hermes, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hermes, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hermes, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hermes, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volvo, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chanel, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subaru, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)