hermes: was associated with bag of money

Property	Similarity
was associated with bag of money	1.00
was associated with bag	0.97
be birkin expensive bag	0.87
have expensive bags	0.82
has physical part bags	0.82
have investment bags	0.78
have costly bags	0.78

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(hermes, have investment bags)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(hermes, have investment bags)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(hermes, have investment bags)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(hermes, have investment bags)

Parents	brand Weight: 0.67 , god Weight: 0.61 , name Weight: 0.58 , store Weight: 0.54
Siblings	burberry Weight: 0.36 , chanel Weight: 0.36 , mercedes benz Weight: 0.35 , volvo Weight: 0.35 , subaru Weight: 0.35

hermes: was associated with bag of money

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible