hermes: was well known

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was well known 1.00
was known 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hermes, was well known)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hermes, was known)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was known)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hermes, was known)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hermes, was known)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was well known)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hermes, was well known) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hermes, was well known)