hernia: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, illness
Weight: 0.57
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, complication
Weight: 0.53
Siblings achilles tendon
Weight: 0.38
, knee
Weight: 0.37
, ligament
Weight: 0.36
, hamstring
Weight: 0.36
, tendon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is issue 0.78
is priority health issue 0.76
has state sore 0.76
has state disorder 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hernia, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(injury, is priority health issue)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hernia, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(injury, is priority health issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(injury, is priority health issue)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(achilles tendon, has state sore)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state sore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(injury, is priority health issue)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hernia, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hamstring, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has state sore)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(achilles tendon, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(achilles tendon, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hernia, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hernia, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(injury, is priority health issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamstring, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hamstring, has state sore)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(achilles tendon, has state sore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hernia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(injury, is priority health issue)