hernia: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, illness
Weight: 0.57
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, complication
Weight: 0.53
Siblings achilles tendon
Weight: 0.38
, knee
Weight: 0.37
, ligament
Weight: 0.36
, hamstring
Weight: 0.36
, tendon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality question 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hernia, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hernia, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hernia, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hernia, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hernia, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hernia, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hernia, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hernia, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hernia, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hernia, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hamstring, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hernia, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)