herpes: have considered latent viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.73
, infection
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings genital herpes
Weight: 0.39
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, influenza
Weight: 0.37
, hepatitis
Weight: 0.36
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have considered latent viruses 1.00
have considered viruses 0.89
be virus type 1 0.81
be virus type 1 transmitted 0.81
be virus able 0.80
has state virus 0.80
be mistaken for yeast infection 0.78
cause microbe transmitted to next 0.77
cause microbe transmitted from one victim to next 0.76
be simplex virus type 1 transmitted 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(herpes, have considered latent viruses)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be mistaken for yeast infection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(herpes, cause microbe transmitted from one victim to next)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(herpes, be simplex virus type 1 transmitted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(herpes, be mistaken for yeast infection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(herpes, be simplex virus type 1 transmitted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(herpes, cause microbe transmitted from one victim to next)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(herpes, be simplex virus type 1 transmitted)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be simplex virus type 1 transmitted)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(herpes, be mistaken for yeast infection)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(herpes, cause microbe transmitted from one victim to next)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(herpes, be mistaken for yeast infection)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(herpes, cause microbe transmitted from one victim to next)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(herpes, have considered latent viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(herpes, have considered latent viruses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(influenza, has state virus)