hierarchy: be important in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, relationship
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.53
Siblings culture
Weight: 0.32
, selfishness
Weight: 0.32
, virtue
Weight: 0.32
, tendency
Weight: 0.31
, faith
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in organization 1.00
be important in society 0.78
be important in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(principle, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(principle, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(culture, be important in society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(culture, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(culture, be important in society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hierarchy, be important in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hierarchy, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hierarchy, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(principle, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(culture, be important in society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hierarchy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(principle, be important in business)