hierarchy: be important in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, relationship
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.53
Siblings culture
Weight: 0.32
, selfishness
Weight: 0.32
, virtue
Weight: 0.32
, tendency
Weight: 0.31
, faith
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in workplace 1.00
be important in society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(culture, be important in society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(culture, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(culture, be important in society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hierarchy, be important in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hierarchy, be important in society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hierarchy, be important in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hierarchy, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(culture, be important in society)