high rise: be at residential area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.53
, feature
Weight: 0.51
, apartment
Weight: 0.48
, restaurant
Weight: 0.48
, issue
Weight: 0.47
Siblings expansion
Weight: 0.30
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.30
, raise
Weight: 0.30
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.30
, construction
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at residential area 1.00
be at suburban area 0.79
be at metropolitan city 0.78
be used to condominium 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at suburban area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fast food chain, be at suburban area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be at suburban area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(high rise, be at residential area)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(high rise, be at metropolitan city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(high rise, be at metropolitan city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(high rise, be at metropolitan city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be at metropolitan city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be at residential area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(high rise, be at residential area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be at residential area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at suburban area)