high rise: be used to condo

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.53
, feature
Weight: 0.51
, apartment
Weight: 0.48
, restaurant
Weight: 0.48
, issue
Weight: 0.47
Siblings expansion
Weight: 0.30
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.30
, raise
Weight: 0.30
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.30
, construction
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to condo 1.00
be used to condominium 0.95
be used to apartment 0.82
be at apartment build 0.81
be at another apartment 0.81
be at and apartment complex 0.80
be at apartment complex 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(apartment, be at and apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(apartment, be at another apartment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at apartment complex)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at another apartment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at and apartment complex)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at apartment complex)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at another apartment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at apartment build)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condo)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(apartment, be at another apartment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condo)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(apartment, be at and apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condo)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(high rise, be used to condo)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(high rise, be used to apartment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to apartment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condominium)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(high rise, be used to apartment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to apartment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(high rise, be used to condo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment build)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apartment, be at another apartment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment complex)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment build)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apartment, be at another apartment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apartment, be at and apartment complex)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(high rise, be used to condo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment complex)