hiker: has fatness fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.32
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, cyclist
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fatness fat 1.00
get calories 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hiker, has fatness fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, has fatness fat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, has fatness fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hiker, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hiker, has fatness fat)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(hiker, get calories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hiker, get calories)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hiker, get calories)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hiker, get calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hiker, has fatness fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hiker, has fatness fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has fatness fat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hiker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, has fatness fat)