hiker: put on clothes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.32
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, cyclist
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
put on clothes 1.00
put on thick clothes 0.91
wear clothes 0.90
put on thicker clothes 0.85
wear thick clothes 0.85
wear wool socks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear clothes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cyclist, wear clothes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cyclist, wear clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hiker, put on clothes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hiker, put on thick clothes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hiker, put on thicker clothes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear clothes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(hiker, put on thick clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hiker, wear clothes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hiker, wear clothes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hiker, wear clothes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear wool socks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hiker, put on thicker clothes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hiker, put on thick clothes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hiker, put on thicker clothes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hiker, wear wool socks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hiker, put on thicker clothes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hiker, put on thick clothes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hiker, wear wool socks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hiker, wear wool socks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hiker, put on clothes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hiker, put on clothes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear clothes)