hiker: use topographic maps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.32
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, cyclist
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
use topographic maps 1.00
use maps 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hiker, use topographic maps)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(hiker, use maps)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hiker, use maps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hiker, use maps)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hiker, use maps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hiker, use topographic maps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(hiker, use topographic maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hiker, use topographic maps)