hill: be good places to rear sheeps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, song
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, adventure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mountain
Weight: 0.35
, boulder
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good places to rear sheeps 1.00
be good places to sheeps 0.93
be good places to rear sheep 0.92
be good places to sheep 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hill, be good places to sheeps)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheep)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hill, be good places to sheeps)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheep)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hill, be good places to sheeps)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheep)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hill, be good places to sheep)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(hill, be good places to sheep)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hill, be good places to sheep)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hill, be good places to rear sheep)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hill, be good places to sheeps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(hill, be good places to sheep)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hill, be good places to rear sheeps)