hip: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgery
Weight: 0.64
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.60
, joint
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shoulder
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.35
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.34
, wrist
Weight: 0.34
, ankle
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
was good 0.81
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
hurt bad 0.77
is terrible 0.77
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(surgery, was good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(surgery, was good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(surgery, was good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hip, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(shoulder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(shoulder, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(shoulder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shoulder, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hip, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hip, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hip, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hip, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hip, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(surgery, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoulder, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoulder, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hip, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(surgery, was good)