hippopotamus: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pachyderm
Weight: 0.53
, animal
Weight: 0.52
Siblings zebra
Weight: 0.37
, elephant
Weight: 0.37
, giraffe
Weight: 0.36
, rhino
Weight: 0.36
, monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
have shaped teeth 0.83
have oddly shaped teeth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hippopotamus, have shaped teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hippopotamus, have shaped teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hippopotamus, have shaped teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hippopotamus, have shaped teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(hippopotamus, have oddly shaped teeth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hippopotamus, have oddly shaped teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hippopotamus, have oddly shaped teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hippopotamus, have oddly shaped teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hippopotamus, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part teeth)