his: has state potential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state potential 1.00
be current state 0.78
has state development 0.78
be possible 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(his, has state potential)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(his, be current state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(his, has state development)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(his, be possible)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(his, be current state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(his, has state development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(his, be possible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(his, be current state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(his, has state development)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(his, be possible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(his, be current state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(his, has state development)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(his, be possible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(his, has state potential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(his, has state potential)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(his, has state potential)