histamine: is antagonists recommended

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mediator
Weight: 0.63
, neurotransmitter
Weight: 0.61
, amine
Weight: 0.61
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical compound
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acetylcholine
Weight: 0.38
, serotonin
Weight: 0.37
, dopamine
Weight: 0.36
, norepinephrine
Weight: 0.35
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is antagonists recommended 1.00
is h2 antagonists recommended 0.94
has physical part antagonists 0.90
is h2 antagonists 0.87
is h2 antagonists recommended for gastroesophageal reflux 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(histamine, is h2 antagonists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(histamine, has physical part antagonists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(histamine, is h2 antagonists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(histamine, is h2 antagonists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(histamine, has physical part antagonists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended for gastroesophageal reflux)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(histamine, is h2 antagonists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(histamine, has physical part antagonists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended for gastroesophageal reflux)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(histamine, has physical part antagonists)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended for gastroesophageal reflux)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(histamine, is h2 antagonists recommended for gastroesophageal reflux)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(histamine, is antagonists recommended)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(histamine, is antagonists recommended)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(histamine, is antagonists recommended)