history: affect development of scientific ideas

Property	Similarity
affect development of scientific ideas	1.00
be considered scientific discipline	0.79
be related to science	0.79
be considered science	0.79
be related to social science	0.78
is science	0.78
be considered social science	0.78
be necessary to study of science	0.78
be considered as social science	0.78
be considered as science	0.78

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(history, be considered science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(history, be considered science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(history, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(history, be considered social science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(history, is science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(history, be considered as social science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(history, be related to social science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(history, be considered as science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(history, be considered as science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(history, be considered social science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(history, be considered as social science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(history, be considered science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(history, is science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(history, be considered social science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(history, be considered as science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(history, be considered as social science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(history, be related to social science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as social science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(history, be considered social science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(history, is science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(history, be considered science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(history, affect development of scientific ideas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as science)

Parents	civilization Weight: 0.66 , element Weight: 0.65 , moment Weight: 0.64 , region Weight: 0.64
Siblings	roman empire Weight: 0.33 , time Weight: 0.33 , nature Weight: 0.32 , facet Weight: 0.32 , thing Weight: 0.32

history: affect development of scientific ideas

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings