history: be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science 1.00
be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology science 0.99
be related to psychology 0.90
be related to economics 0.89
is social science 0.87
be related to social science 0.86
be considered social science 0.85
is science 0.84
be considered as social science 0.84
be related to science 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nature, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(nature, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nature, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(history, be related to psychology)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(history, be related to psychology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(history, be related to economics)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(history, be related to psychology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, is social science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(history, is social science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(history, be related to economics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(history, be related to social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(history, be considered social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(history, be considered social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(history, is social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(history, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(history, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be considered as social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(history, be considered as social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(history, be related to social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(history, is science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered as social science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, is social science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as social science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered social science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(history, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics philosophy psychology sociology political science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(nature, be related to science)