history: be related to geography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to geography 1.00
be connected with geography 0.92
be related to economics with example 0.78
be related to politics 0.77
be related 0.77
be related to archeology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(civilization, be related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be related to geography)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(civilization, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(civilization, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(time, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(civilization, be related)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(history, be related to geography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(time, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(time, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(history, be related to geography)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(history, be connected with geography)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(history, be connected with geography)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(history, be connected with geography)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(history, be connected with geography)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to economics with example)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to archeology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(history, be related to economics with example)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(history, be related to archeology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(history, be related to economics with example)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(history, be related to economics with example)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(history, be related to archeology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(history, be related to archeology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be related to geography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(civilization, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(time, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(history, be related to geography)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(civilization, be related)