history: be related to other social discipline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to other social discipline 1.00
be related to social discipline 0.99
be related to other social disciplines 0.87
be related to social disciplines 0.85
be considered scientific discipline 0.85
be related to social science 0.83
is social 0.81
be related to other disciplines 0.80
be considered as social science 0.79
relate to other branches of social science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(history, is social)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(history, be related to social science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(history, is social)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(history, be considered as social science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(history, is social)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered as social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(history, be related to other social disciplines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(history, be related to social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(history, is social)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be considered as social science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(history, relate to other branches of social science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to other social discipline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(history, be related to other social discipline)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(history, be related to other social discipline)