ho: was chi minh good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, man
Weight: 0.54
, word
Weight: 0.52
, book
Weight: 0.52
, writer
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chi minh good 1.00
was chi minh 0.99
is chi city 0.96
is chi minh city 0.96
is chi minh city important 0.96
is chi city important 0.96
was chi minh trail 0.91
was chi trail 0.91
is chi minh trail important 0.91
is chi trail important 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ho, was chi minh good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ho, was chi minh)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ho, was chi minh)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ho, was chi minh)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ho, is chi city)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ho, was chi trail)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ho, is chi minh city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(ho, was chi minh trail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ho, is chi minh city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ho, is chi city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ho, was chi trail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ho, was chi trail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ho, was chi minh trail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ho, was chi minh trail)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ho, is chi minh city important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ho, is chi city important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ho, is chi minh city important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ho, is chi city important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ho, is chi minh trail important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ho, is chi trail important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi minh city important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi minh trail important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi city important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ho, was chi trail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi minh city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ho, is chi trail important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ho, is chi minh trail important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi trail important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ho, was chi minh trail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi minh city important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi city important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi trail important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ho, is chi minh trail important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ho, was chi minh)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi minh city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ho, is chi city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ho, was chi minh good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ho, was chi minh good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ho, was chi minh good)