hockey player: hit on ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
hit on ice 1.00
get on ice 0.90
play on ice 0.89
leave on ice 0.87
stay on ice 0.85
bang on ice 0.85
tap on ice 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey player, hit on ice)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hockey player, get on ice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hockey player, leave on ice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hockey player, leave on ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hockey player, get on ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hockey player, get on ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, leave on ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hockey player, play on ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hockey player, play on ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, stay on ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hockey player, tap on ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, leave on ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hockey player, tap on ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hockey player, play on ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(hockey player, stay on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hockey player, stay on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hockey player, bang on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hockey player, tap on ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, tap on ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hockey player, bang on ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey player, bang on ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, bang on ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, play on ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, get on ice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, stay on ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, hit on ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hockey player, hit on ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey player, hit on ice)