hockey player: ice skate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, people
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
ice skate 1.00
be go after puck 0.78
be go to hit puck 0.78
be at hockey game 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(player, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(player, be at hockey game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(player, be at hockey game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(goalie, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(player, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(goalie, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(goalie, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hockey player, ice skate)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go to hit puck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey player, be go to hit puck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go to hit puck)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at hockey game)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go to hit puck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(player, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(goalie, be at hockey game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(player, be at hockey game)