hockey player: wear tinted visors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear tinted visors 1.00
wear visors 0.94
wear helmets 0.84
wear yellow laces 0.80
wear pads 0.78
wear many pads 0.77
wear suits 0.77
wear laces 0.77
wear mouthguards 0.77
wear socks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear socks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear helmets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(goalie, wear helmets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(goalie, wear pads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(goalie, wear helmets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(goalie, wear helmets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(football player, wear helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(football player, wear helmets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(goalie, wear pads)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(goalie, wear pads)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(football player, wear socks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(football player, wear socks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear visors)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear visors)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear visors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear helmets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear helmets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear mouthguards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear mouthguards)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear helmets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear mouthguards)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear yellow laces)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear yellow laces)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hockey player, wear suits)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear suits)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear visors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear mouthguards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear yellow laces)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hockey player, wear suits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear yellow laces)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear helmets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear suits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hockey player, wear tinted visors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(goalie, wear pads)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(goalie, wear helmets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(football player, wear socks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, wear tinted visors)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(football player, wear helmets)