hockey puck: be used to kill someone

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.51
, projectile
Weight: 0.50
Siblings hockey stick
Weight: 0.36
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.33
, baseball bat
Weight: 0.33
, cotton ball
Weight: 0.32
, dvd player
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to kill someone 1.00
be used to kill somebody 0.97
be used to kill 0.94
be used to something that be over cook 0.77
be used to injure 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(projectile, be used to kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projectile, be used to injure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(projectile, be used to injure)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(projectile, be used to kill)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(projectile, be used to kill)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(projectile, be used to injure)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(baseball bat, be used to kill somebody)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(projectile, be used to kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projectile, be used to injure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(baseball bat, be used to kill somebody) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(baseball bat, be used to kill somebody)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey puck, be used to something that be over cook)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hockey puck, be used to something that be over cook)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to something that be over cook)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hockey puck, be used to something that be over cook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(projectile, be used to kill)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(projectile, be used to injure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(baseball bat, be used to kill somebody)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(projectile, be used to kill)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hockey puck, be used to kill someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(projectile, be used to injure)