hockey: be considered as game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as game 1.00
is game 0.88
be considered as national game in india 0.83
is national game 0.81
play 0.78
be played 0.77
was played 0.77
be played on ice 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hockey, be considered as game)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hockey, is game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hockey, is game)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, be considered as national game in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as national game in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey, is national game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hockey, be played)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hockey, was played)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is national game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hockey, be considered as national game in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as national game in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey, is national game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hockey, is national game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hockey, be considered as game)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)