hockey: be good sport involved in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good sport involved in 1.00
be good sport involved 1.00
is good sport 0.93
be good sport play 0.90
is bad sport 0.90
is great sport 0.89
be sport 0.88
is sport 0.88
is best sport 0.88
be considered sport 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ice hockey, is sport)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is sport)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ice hockey, is best sport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is best sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hockey, is sport)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hockey, be sport)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, is good sport)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hockey, is sport)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, be sport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport play)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hockey, is bad sport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered sport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hockey, is sport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hockey, is great sport)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hockey, be considered sport)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hockey, be sport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey, is best sport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is good sport)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport play)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hockey, be considered sport)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hockey, is good sport)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, is good sport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be sport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is sport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hockey, is bad sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hockey, is great sport)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hockey, is best sport)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is bad sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hockey, is great sport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey, is best sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is sport)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is best sport)