hockey: be named hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named hockey 1.00
be called hockey 0.95
is rink ice 0.76
be better than soccer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(hockey, be named hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hockey, be called hockey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hockey, be called hockey)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hockey, be called hockey)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be called hockey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hockey, is rink ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, is rink ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hockey, is rink ice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is rink ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be named hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hockey, be named hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey, be named hockey)