hockey: be played on ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played on ice 1.00
is ice 0.87
be played 0.87
was played 0.86
is played in winter 0.86
be played on wet field 0.84
be played on wet pitch 0.83
is rink ice 0.81
play 0.80
throw fish on ice 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on ice)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is played in winter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hockey, throw fish on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hockey, throw fish on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hockey, throw fish on ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey, is ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hockey, is ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is rink ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hockey, is ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hockey, throw fish on ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, is played in winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hockey, be played)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hockey, was played)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hockey, is rink ice)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, is rink ice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hockey, is rink ice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hockey, is played in winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hockey, is played in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)